BlogISO 42001
April 16, 2025

EU AI Act and ISO 42001: Compatibility and implementation guidelines

Written by
Vanta
Reviewed by
No items found.

Accelerating security solutions for small businesses 

Tagore offers strategic services to small businesses. 

A partnership that can scale 

Tagore prioritized finding a managed compliance partner with an established product, dedicated support team, and rapid release rate.

Standing out from competitors

Tagore's partnership with Vanta enhances its strategic focus and deepens client value, creating differentiation in a competitive market.

The EU AI Act introduced the first comprehensive, harmonized regulatory framework for managing AI systems ethically and responsibly. Before the Act, the closest we had to such robust guidelines was ISO 42001, which has a similar overarching goal.

If you’ve already implemented ISO 42001, you might have a head start in achieving EU AI Act compliance. In this guide, we explain why this is the case by covering:

  • The purpose and scope of the EU AI Act and ISO 42001
  • The complementary and harmonious relationship between the two frameworks
  • Steps and strategies to approach compliance with both standards

EU AI Act and ISO 42001: Similarities and differences

The EU AI Act and ISO 42001 aim to ensure safe and responsible development, implementation, and use of AI systems. Still, they approach this goal differently.

The EU AI Act is a mandatory regulation that applies to all EU-based organizations and those that provide services in the EU. Meanwhile, ISO 42001 is an international, voluntary standard with recommended best practices for building a comprehensive AI management system (AIMS).

Another considerable difference is the certification type:

  • ISO 42001 is a certifiable standard, and an obtained certificate is valid for three years
  • The EU AI Act requires only self-attestation, with re-attestation needed only if significant changes are made to the AI system

Even though ISO 42001 is a certifiable standard, this certification is voluntary and organizations are not mandated to achieve it. By contrast, the EU AI Act carries considerable legal weight, so non-compliance can lead to substantial fines and penalties.

Despite these differences, the shared goal of the EU AI Act and ISO 42001 results in notable overlaps between these frameworks.

{{cta_withimage37="/cta-blocks"}} | EU AI Act checklist

The relationship between the EU AI Act and ISO 42001

The EU AI Act and ISO 42001 have around 40–50% overlap in high-level requirements. Both frameworks cover several important aspects of responsible AI system development and implementation, such as:

  • Data governance: Article 10 of the EU AI Act outlines various data governance requirements regarding data categorization and bias detection. Similarly, ISO 42001 also focuses on bias detection and mitigation and calls for clear roles to be defined in charge of AIMS oversight, which should encompass effective data governance.
  • Risk management: The backbone of the EU AI Act is the classification of risks into four categories (unacceptable, high, limited, and minimal) and the different treatment of AI systems depending on their risk level. ISO 42001 offers a clear framework for effective risk assessment, which helps categorize different AI system risks and manage them accordingly. 
  • Human oversight: As per Article 14 of the EU AI Act, AI systems should be developed to enable ongoing human oversight, with specific measures corresponding with the risk level. ISO 42001 aligns with this requirement, mainly by recommending the detailed documentation of AI processes for increased transparency and easier oversight. 
  • Ethical implications: Both the EU AI Act and ISO 42001 emphasize the importance of ethical use of AI systems, which includes fairness in decision-making, bias mitigation, and other measures that prevent harmful effects of AI implementation.
  • High-risk AI systems: ISO 42001 provides practical guidelines for detecting and discontinuing AI systems that breach EU AI Act prohibitions, including untargeted facial recognition or biased decision-making algorithms.

These overlaps allow your team to reuse the existing controls you might have put into place while pursuing ISO 42001 certification to simplify compliance with the EU AI Act.

How to approach compliance with ISO 42001 and the EU AI Act

If you’ve already obtained an ISO 42001 certificate, the first step toward EU AI Act compliance is to cross-reference your existing controls with the Act’s requirements. You can then identify all compliance gaps that require remediation to ensure adherence to the Act.

If you haven’t achieved ISO 42001 compliance, you can choose whether to implement it first or focus on the EU AI Act directly. Since the Act is comprehensive and mandatory, prioritizing it might be the more practical option.

This doesn’t mean you should skip ISO 42001 compliance altogether—becoming certified lets you build a robust AIMS that helps future-proof your AI-related operations. It can also give you a notable competitive advantage because it shows commitment to responsible AI use beyond the mandatory regulations.

With this in mind, combining ISO 42001 certification with EU AI Act compliance is the most comprehensive way to develop and implement AI responsibly. To help, we’ll go over the high-level processes of complying with both standards.

{{cta_withimage7="/cta-blocks"}}

How to obtain an ISO 42001 certificate

To become ISO 42001-certified, you can take the following steps:

  1. Understand the principles and requirements: ISO 42001 has 10 clauses, six of which outline the specific requirements you must meet to get certified. It also includes four annexes with detailed prescriptive guidance you can use to implement the necessary controls.
  2. Conduct a gap analysis: Analyze your current or prospective AI system to see how it aligns with ISO 42001 requirements. Some of the key aspects you’ll need to review include roles and responsibilities, data and resources used to build the system, and the impact of AI systems on stakeholders and your broader environment. Use the findings to develop a strategy for closing the gaps and achieving compliance.
  3. Build your AIMS: Go through the ISO requirements to develop the policies, procedures, and practices that will be encompassed by your AIMS to ensure ongoing compliance with the prescribed standards.
  4. Document your processes: Document the implementation of the relevant controls to ensure transparency and clear oversight of your AI processes.
  5. Continuously monitor and improve: Continuously monitor and review your AIMS to identify opportunities for the improvement of its suitability, adequacy, and effectiveness.

How to achieve EU AI Act compliance

While the specific steps to achieving EU AI Act compliance depend on the current state of your AI systems, the general process consists of the following steps:

  1. Assess the Act’s impact on your organization: Use the EU AI Act Compliance Checker to precisely determine how the Act affects your organization
  2. Review and document your AI practices: Perform a comprehensive assessment of your current AI systems, documenting the related policies and practices to make the relevant information readily available to auditing bodies
  3. Perform a conformity assessment: If your AI system is classified as high-risk, conduct a conformity assessment to bridge any compliance gaps related to transparency, risk management, record-keeping, and other relevant requirements
  4. Submit your EU Declaration of Conformity: After ensuring EU AI Act compliance, submit an EU Declaration of Conformity in physical or electronic form
  5. Conduct post-market monitoring and reassessment: Develop a system for continuously monitoring and reporting your AI system’s performance and adherence to the EU AI Act

Vanta: Your ISO 42001 and EU AI Act compliance partner

Vanta is an end-to-end compliance and trust management solution that helps you achieve compliance with ISO 42001 and the EU AI Act more swiftly while using fewer resources. It offers a dedicated EU AI product with comprehensive resources and features, such as:

  • 150+ pre-built controls alongside custom ones
  • 15+ policies and 50+ ready-made documents based on ISO 42001
  • In-app policy editor
  • Risk management features

Vanta also cross-references your existing controls with other authoritative sources, which can be particularly helpful if you’ve already adopted ISO 42001 and want to pursue EU AI Act compliance without duplicate workflows.

If you haven’t obtained an ISO 42001 certificate yet, you can use Vanta’s ISO 42001 product to leverage its numerous automation features and become certified without extensive manual work.

For more information on how Vanta’s EU AI Act product helps ensure full compliance, schedule a custom demo and see the platform live.

{{cta_simple31="/cta-blocks"}} 

A note from Vanta: Vanta is not a law firm, and this article does not constitute or contain legal advice or create an attorney-client relationship. When determining your obligations and compliance with respect to relevant laws and regulations, you should consult a licensed attorney.

Access Review Stage Content / Functionality
Across all stages
  • Easily create and save a new access review at a point in time
  • View detailed audit evidence of historical access reviews
Setup access review procedures
  • Define a global access review procedure that stakeholders can follow, ensuring consistency and mitigation of human error in reviews
  • Set your access review frequency (monthly, quarterly, etc.) and working period/deadlines
Consolidate account access data from systems
  • Integrate systems using dozens of pre-built integrations, or “connectors”. System account and HRIS data is pulled into Vanta.
  • Upcoming integrations include Zoom and Intercom (account access), and Personio (HRIS)
  • Upload access files from non-integrated systems
  • View and select systems in-scope for the review
Review, approve, and deny user access
  • Select the appropriate systems reviewer and due date
  • Get automatic notifications and reminders to systems reviewer of deadlines
  • Automatic flagging of “risky” employee accounts that have been terminated or switched departments
  • Intuitive interface to see all accounts with access, account accept/deny buttons, and notes section
  • Track progress of individual systems access reviews and see accounts that need to be removed or have access modified
  • Bulk sort, filter, and alter accounts based on account roles and employee title
Assign remediation tasks to system owners
  • Built-in remediation workflow for reviewers to request access changes and for admin to view and manage requests
  • Optional task tracker integration to create tickets for any access changes and provide visibility to the status of tickets and remediation
Verify changes to access
  • Focused view of accounts flagged for access changes for easy tracking and management
  • Automated evidence of remediation completion displayed for integrated systems
  • Manual evidence of remediation can be uploaded for non-integrated systems
Report and re-evaluate results
  • Auditor can log into Vanta to see history of all completed access reviews
  • Internals can see status of reviews in progress and also historical review detail
FEATURED VANTA RESOURCE

The ultimate guide to scaling your compliance program

Learn how to scale, manage, and optimize alongside your business goals.