110 security and compliance statistics for tech leaders to know in 2025
Written by
Lucia Giles
Sr. Content Marketing Manager
Reviewed by
Evan Rowse
GRC Subject Matter Expert
Accelerating security solutions for small businesses
Tagore offers strategic services to small businesses.
A partnership that can scale
Tagore prioritized finding a managed compliance partner with an established product, dedicated support team, and rapid release rate.
Standing out from competitors
Tagore's partnership with Vanta enhances its strategic focus and deepens client value, creating differentiation in a competitive market.
Staying compliant has never been more complex or more critical. With evolving regulations, expanding tech stacks, and increasing third-party exposure, today’s security and compliance teams are under constant pressure to reduce risk while upholding trust. Understanding the latest trends is key to staying ahead.
This roundup of security and compliance statistics brings together the most up-to-date data on regulatory readiness, breach impact, automation, vendor risk, and more. It offers a snapshot of the industry's current state and how security and privacy compliance priorities are evolving across different teams and sectors.
Key takeaways
Compliance workloads are rising, with teams now spending an average of 9.5 hours per week on compliance-related tasks, up from 8.1 hours in 2023—equivalent to 11 full working weeks per year
(Vanta, 2024)
Budget expectations outpace reality: Organizations believe that 17% of their IT budget should ideally go to security and compliance, a figure significantly higher than what most are currently allocating
(Vanta, 2024)
66% of organizations expect AI to have the biggest impact on cybersecurity in the coming year, yet only 37% have processes in place to assess the security of AI tools before deployment (World Economic Forum, 2025)
46% of organizations say that a vendor of theirs has experienced a data breach since the partnership began (Vanta, 2024)
Only 2% of surveyed organizations reported implementing cyber resilience measures across people, technology, and process areas, indicating a major gap between risk awareness and action (PwC, 2025)
Across lower tiers of the NIST Cybersecurity Framework (CSF), limited budget and resources are cited as the biggest barriers to advancing security maturity (Vanta, 2025)
The current state of risk and compliance
Security and compliance leaders are under mounting pressure to do more with less. As security expectations rise and regulatory environments tighten, teams are spending more time on compliance tasks while facing budget constraints and increasingly complex frameworks.
Many leaders remain optimistic, with signs that compliance is evolving into a more strategic business function. The data shows a widening gap between what’s expected and what teams are realistically equipped to deliver.
Here’s what the compliance landscape looks like in 2025:
On average, professionals are now spending 9.5 hours per week on compliance-related tasks, up from 8.1 hours in 2023. That’s the equivalent of 11 full working weeks per year. (Vanta, 2024)
In an ideal world, companies believe 17% of their IT budget should be dedicated to security and compliance, significantly higher than what most are currently spending. (Vanta, 2024)
Half of all organizations list data breaches and the loss of sensitive information as a primary concern. (Vanta, 2024)
Only 2% of organizations have implemented cyber resilience measures across all surveyed areas, highlighting a major gap between risk awareness and action. (PwC, 2025)
47% of organizations reported failing a formal audit two to five times in the past three years, reflecting the challenge of maintaining compliance across multiple regulatory frameworks. (Coalfire, 2024)
Organizations are beginning to adopt GenAI for cyber defense, with top use cases including threat detection, threat intelligence, and phishing or malware detection. (PwC, 2025)
The cyber skills gap has grown 8% since 2024, with 2 out of 3 organizations reporting moderate to critical talent shortages. (World Economic Forum, 2025)
Only 14% of organizations feel confident they have the people and skills they need to meet security and compliance demands. (World Economic Forum, 2025)
More than half of breached organizations are experiencing severe security staffing shortages, representing a 26.2% increase from the previous year. (IBM, 2024)
Only 37% of compliance leaders feel fully confident in their ability to assess the effectiveness of their compliance programs, revealing a significant gap in measurement and oversight. (Gartner, 2025)
Half of organizations experienced at least one compliance issue in the past three years, with the most common being a data privacy or cybersecurity breach (28%). (Navex, 2024)
85% of organizations say compliance requirements have become more complex over the past three years, reflecting growing regulatory burdens and rising expectations from stakeholders. (PwC, 2025)
47% of organizations cite regulatory complexity as the top factor making compliance more difficult, followed by organizational complexity (34%), culture (29%), and limited resource capacity (28%). (PwC, 2025)
44% of organizations invest in compliance to respond to regulatory issues, 42% to keep up with changing regulations, and 40% to mitigate risk more effectively. (PwC, 2025)
Cybersecurity and data protection/privacy are now tied as the top compliance priorities, each cited by 51% of organizations. Other top areas include corporate governance (40%), anti-bribery and fraud (38%), and AI compliance (26%). (PwC, 2025)
78% of organizations say the complexity of compliance requirements has negatively impacted their ability to launch new products or enter new markets, turning compliance into a barrier to innovation and growth. (PwC, 2025)
The business risks of non-compliance
The cost of getting compliance wrong extends far beyond paperwork. Breaches or violations can stall business operations, erode customer trust, and lead to steep financial penalties. Fines alone are a growing business risk, and for some companies, the financial and reputational damage can be hard to recover from.
As organizations scale into new markets, the bar for compliance only gets higher. This section breaks down the consequences of falling short, from business disruption and slow breach response to the real-world costs of non-compliance.
Nearly half (48%) of organizations believe good security practices drive customer trust for their business (up 7% from last year), and 46% recognize that good security practices lead to reduced financial risks. (Vanta, 2024)
While 88% of executives agree that measuring cyber risk is key to prioritizing investments, and 87% say it helps allocate resources effectively, only 15% of organizations are actually doing it at a significant level. (PwC, 2025)
70% of organizations experienced a significant or very significant business disruption as a result of a data breach, highlighting the operational impact beyond financial loss. (IBM, 2024)
In 2024, breaches disclosed by attackers took the longest to resolve, with an average of 289 days to identify and contain—including 212 days just to detect the breach. (IBM, 2024)
In contrast, breaches identified by security teams and tools were resolved fastest, averaging 228 days, while benign third-party disclosures took 240 days. (IBM, 2024)
The average cost of a data breach rose to $4.88 million in 2024, a 10% increase from the previous year. (IBM, 2024)
At $9.36 million, the United States has the highest average data breach cost globally—the UK came in 7th at $4.53 million and Australia was 13th at $2.78 million. (IBM, 2024)
Lost business and post-breach response costs hit a combined $4.88 million in 2024—a 10% increase from 2023. (IBM, 2024)
Security staffing shortages are linked to an average of $1.76 million in additional breach costs, demonstrating how under-resourced teams can significantly raise the financial impact of non-compliance. (IBM, 2024)
In 2024, the Office for Civil Rights (OCR) closed 22 HIPAA investigations with financial penalties, highlighting the potential costs of non-compliance in the healthcare sector. (HIPAA Journal, 2025)
In 2025, EU regulators imposed a €530 million fine—one of the highest fines of the year—highlighting the steep financial risk of non-compliance with data protection laws. (Irish Data Protection Commission, 2025)
The cost of compliance
Security and privacy compliance isn’t just a regulatory obligation; it’s a major line item in the IT and operations budget. Compliance costs can climb quickly, especially for growing or highly regulated companies.
Most organizations are investing in security compliance infrastructure, but resource constraints remain a consistent challenge. Teams are increasingly looking to automation and strategic in-house staffing to reduce long-term costs, but rising complexity and limited capacity are still a challenge.
78% of organizations now allocate a dedicated cybersecurity budget, with 35% designating between 6% and 10% of their overall IT spend to cybersecurity-related needs. (Vanta, 2024)
Across the lower NIST CSF tiers—partial, risk-informed, and repeatable—organizations cite limited budget and resources as the biggest challenge to advancing their security maturity. (Vanta, 2025)
The average U.S. firm spends between 1.3% and 3.3% of its total wage bill on regulatory compliance. (Cato Research Briefs, 2024)
89% of organizations say compliance complexity has negatively impacted IT and data management, with 34% saying it did so to a great extent. (PwC, 2025)
43% of organizations say compliance complexity has hurt profitability, either directly or by limiting investment in growth initiatives. (PwC, 2025)
Compliance software adoption and tool usage stats
As the complexity of risk and regulation grows, compliance leaders are turning to automation and digital tools to keep pace. Across the board, companies are looking to save time, reduce spreadsheet tracking, and improve visibility, all while staying audit-ready and responsive to change.
These compliance industry trends show a clear shift toward purpose-built software, with technology streamlining everything from policy training to breach detection.
Organizations estimate they could save an average of three to five hours per week on compliance tasks through automation. (Vanta, 2024)
Automating the monitoring of compliance systems and collecting audit evidence could save more than 4.5 hours weekly. (Vanta, 2024)
65% of organizations say they have good visibility into how AI tools are used across the business, yet 51% believe internal AI use is increasing overall security risk. (Vanta, 2024)
In non-actor-disclosed breaches, software-based detection methods played a major role: Infrastructure monitoring (18%), antivirus tools (9%), and log review systems (8%) were among the top detection methods. (Verizon, 2025)
30% of leaders are prioritizing more tailored compliance training with growing investment in learning platforms, policy management tools, and automated training systems. (Gartner, 2024)
65% of organizations report using manual processes for most GRC activities, limiting their ability to apply consistent, repeatable controls. (Coalfire, 2024)
65% of organizations say enforcing compliance controls requires specialized training or certifications. (Coalfire, 2024)
High-resilience organizations promote incident reporting through layered support. In these organizations, 76% offer cyber awareness training, 62% provide support teams, and 48% enable anonymous reporting. (World Economic Forum, 2025)
82% of organizations plan to increase investment in technology to support compliance activities. (PwC, 2025)
49% of organizations are using technology for 11 or more compliance activities, signaling broad adoption across workflows. (PwC, 2025)
82% of organizations use technology to support compliance training, making it the most common area of tech adoption. (PwC, 2025)
76% of organizations leverage tech for risk assessments, 75% for compliance and transaction monitoring, and 72% for disclosures and reporting. (PwC, 2025)
64% of organizations report improved visibility into risks from technology investment—the most cited benefit. (PwC, 2025)
53% of organizations cite faster identification and response to compliance issues, while 48% report better quality reporting. (PwC, 2025)
42% of respondents have seen quicker responses to regulatory changes, and an equal share report increased trust from stakeholders in their compliance capabilities. (PwC, 2025)
41% say tech investment has improved collaboration across teams, and 31% report faster compliance approvals for new products and services. (PwC, 2025)
75% of healthcare and social assistance organizations use purpose-built technology for policy management, compared to 68% overall. (Navex, 2024)
71% of organizations believe AI will have a net positive impact on compliance, particularly in improving speed, accuracy, and insight. (PwC, 2025)
Vendor and third-party trends
Third-party vendors remain one of the most overlooked yet consequential risks in today’s security landscape. Despite growing reliance on external partners and digital supply chains, many organizations still underestimate how deeply vendor vulnerabilities impact their security posture and compliance performance.
These trends reveal a widening gap between perceived preparedness and actual risk exposure.
Only 27% of organizations list third-party/vendor risks as a top concern, despite it being a major contributor to data breaches. (Vanta, 2024)
58% of organizations say they have strong visibility into vendor risk, yet only 24% rate it as “very strong”, suggesting room for improvement. (Vanta, 2024)
42% of organizations say their vendor risk management process has become more rigorous due to concerns about AI tools. (Vanta, 2025 AI governance survey)
Organizations spend an average of 6 hours a week on vendor security reviews and risk assessments, the equivalent of 7 working weeks a year. (Vanta, 2024)
42% of organizations say AI is most helpful for streamlining vendor risk reviews and onboarding, more than for reducing manual work (38%) or downsizing teams (30%). (Vanta, 2024)
Half of businesses have ended a vendor relationship due to security concerns. (Vanta, 2024)
Nearly two-thirds (65%) of organizations say that customers, investors, and suppliers are increasingly requiring proof of compliance. (Vanta, 2024)
30% of breaches were linked to third-party involvement—twice as much as the previous year—driven in part by vulnerability exploitation and business interruptions. (Verizon, 2025)
The top four cyber threats—cloud-related attacks, hack-and-leak operations, third-party breaches, and connected product vulnerabilities—are also the areas where security leaders feel least prepared. (PwC, 2025)
40% of leaders prioritize strengthening third-party risk management processes and technology, with 6% ranking it as their top concern. (Gartner, 2024)
65% of organizations say immature vendor or supplier programs require additional oversight, often causing delays in their own compliance workflows. (Coalfire, 2024)
54% of large organizations say supply chain issues are the biggest barrier to achieving cyber resilience, underscoring the growing need for stronger vendor oversight and third-party compliance controls. (World Economic Forum, 2025)
69% of organizations say regulations are too complex or numerous, or they struggle to verify whether third-party suppliers are compliant. (World Economic Forum, 2025)
76% of compliance leaders say improving third-party risk management is their top priority for 2025. (Gartner, 2025)
49% of organizations leverage technology for 11 or more compliance activities—with risk assessment (76%), transaction monitoring (75%), and training (82%) among the top functions being technology-enabled. (PwC, 2025)
82% of companies plan to increase their investment in at least one compliance technology over the next year, suggesting a strong move toward data-driven platforms to manage third-party and broader compliance risks. (PwC, 2025)
The leading causes of data breaches and their overall impact
Data breaches continue to dominate the cybersecurity conversation, with ransomware, human error, and third-party vulnerabilities remaining top causes. As organizations modernize their security programs, the evolving nature of attacks is reshaping how leaders think about exposure and mitigation.
These trends are more than technical concerns. They represent major compliance trends with real business implications. Understanding what causes them and how they unfold is critical for any compliance strategy.
46% of organizations say that a vendor of theirs has experienced a data breach since they started working together. (Vanta, 2025 AI governance survey)
44% of all breaches analyzed involved ransomware, up from 37% in 2024. (Verizon, 2025)
60% of cybersecurity breaches involved human factors, such as credential abuse and social engineering attacks like phishing. (Verizon, 2025)
Exploitation of vulnerabilities was a factor in 20% of breaches, a 34% increase from the previous year. This puts it just behind the use of stolen credentials, which accounted for 22% of breaches. (Verizon, 2025)
Phishing contributed to around 15% of breaches. (Verizon, 2025)
Espionage now accounts for 17% of security breaches, with 28% of state-sponsored attacks being financially motivated. (Verizon, 2025)
81% of breaches involved external actors, compared to 18% from insiders, and 1.2% from partners. (Verizon, 2025)
54% of perimeter-device vulnerabilities were fully remediated by organizations in the past year, and it took a median of 32 days to do so. (Verizon, 2025)
30% of compromised systems were corporate devices, but 46% of compromised systems were unmanaged personal devices—highlighting the risk of BYOD. (Verizon, 2025)
72% of organizations report a rise in cyber risks, with ransomware still ranking among the top threats. (World Economic Forum, 2025)
47% cite adversarial use of generative AI as their primary concern, citing more scalable, sophisticated threats. (World Economic Forum, 2025)
Ransomware is the top cyber risk for 45% of organizations, followed by cyber-enabled fraud (20%) and supply chain attacks (17%). (World Economic Forum, 2025)
Supply chain vulnerabilities (54%) and geopolitical tensions (nearly 60%) are the leading downstream concerns arising from cyberattacks. (World Economic Forum, 2025)
Healthcare has the highest average cost per breach at $9.77 million, driven by outdated systems and operational disruption. (IBM, 2024)
Security teams were responsible for detecting 42% of breaches, outperforming third parties (34%) and attackers (24%). (IBM, 2024)
Framework-specific compliance statistics
As compliance expectations tighten across industries, organizations are turning to established frameworks like SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, and GDPR to guide their programs. These standards offer structured approaches to security, privacy, and risk management, but adoption trends vary depending on maturity levels and industries.
There is a growing reliance on these frameworks, not just for regulatory alignment but also for building stakeholder trust and operational resilience. Vanta’s research reveals how businesses at different maturity tiers engage with specific frameworks, while healthcare and global data privacy laws continue to shape the broader landscape.
Nearly 49% of HIPAA violations or near misses were caused by internal employee errors, such as misdirected emails or improper disposal of records. (Vanta, 2025)
Another 14% were due to unauthorized access by internal employees. (Vanta, 2025)
Organizations in the partial maturity tier of the NIST CSF are most likely to pursue SOC 2 attestation (71%). (Vanta, 2025)
In the risk-informed tier of the NIST CSF, SOC 2 remains dominant (96%), followed by ISO 27001 (18%) and HIPAA (16%). (Vanta, 2025)
Organizations in the repeatable tier of the NIST CSF show growing ambition, with 23% pursuing dual-standard compliance such as SOC 2 and ISO 27001. Top certifications at this stage include SOC 2 (91%), ISO 27001 (32%), GDPR (22%), and HIPAA (18%). (Vanta, 2025)
In the adaptive tier of the NIST CSF, advanced frameworks like ISO 42001 gain traction, with 38% of organizations pursuing certification. (Vanta, 2025)
Around 19% of healthcare data breaches in 2024 were caused by non-hacking incidents—yet hacking alone accounted for 91% of all exposed records. (HIPAA Journal, 2025)
In 2024, over 276 million individuals had their protected health information exposed, averaging 758,288 compromised people per day. (HIPAA Journal, 2025)
In 2024, healthcare was the most targeted industry for data breaches, making up 23% of cases, up from 18% in 2023. (KROLL, 2025)
Approximately 132,000 personal data breach notifications were reported under GDPR between January 2024 and January 2025, an average of 363 per day. (DLA Piper, 2025)
As of February 2025, $2.4 million GDPR penalties were issued due to non-compliance with general data-processing principles and almost $2 million in fines were issued for insufficient legal basis for processing data. (Statista, 2025)
62% of organizations say they must comply with multiple data privacy laws across local, national, and industry-specific levels, creating complexity. (Coalfire, 2024)
69% say achieving compliance with a new regulation can take three months to over a year or more, especially when starting from scratch. (Coalfire, 2024)
The future of compliance
As new technologies reshape how businesses operate, compliance teams are facing mounting pressure to adapt. AI, automation, and cloud adoption are no longer on the horizon—they’re already here, and they’re forcing a redefinition of compliance priorities.
While many organizations see opportunity in this shift, they’re also navigating complex risks and evolving regulations. These stats offer a glimpse into how teams are preparing for what’s next and where gaps still remain.
Only 37% of companies say AI tools used in their organization undergo or are in the process of undergoing regular security assessments, and 62% plan to increase investment in AI security in the next year. (Vanta, 2024)
40% of organizations are already certified or actively pursuing certification (36%) under external AI governance standards like ISO 42001, NIST AI RMF, or the EU AI Act. (Vanta, 2025)
89% of organizations now quantify and measure the impact of their security programs. (Vanta, 2024)
66% of organizations expect AI to have the biggest impact on cybersecurity in the coming year, yet only 37% have processes in place to assess the security of AI tools before deployment. (World Economic Forum, 2025)
Use of AI in cyberattacks is on the rise, with the amount of synthetically generated text in malicious emails doubling over the past two years. (Verizon, 2025)
37% of organizations cite a lack of standardized internal policies as a key barrier to incorporating generative AI into their cybersecurity strategies. (PwC, 2025)
66% of respondents believe artificial intelligence will impact cybersecurity within the next 12 months, though only 37% have fully established safe-AI deployment processes. (World Economic Forum, 2025)
More than 76% of CISOs say regulatory fragmentation across jurisdictions significantly hinders their ability to maintain compliance, despite growing recognition that regulations help improve baseline cybersecurity and build trust. (World Economic Forum, 2025)
72% of organizations say their cyber risks have increased in the past year, and 63% cite the evolving threat landscape as their biggest challenge to achieving cyber resilience. (World Economic Forum, 2025)
1 in 3 CEOs now cite cyber espionage and intellectual property theft as a top concern, reflecting heightened awareness of targeted attacks tied to global instability. (World Economic Forum, 2025)
More organizations are positioning cybersecurity as a competitive advantage ((PwC, 2025)):
57% cite customer trust
49% cite brand integrity
46% say it supports business growth and resilience
39% of executives are focused on ensuring their compliance programs can keep pace with evolving regulatory requirements, and 12% say it's their top priority. (Gartner, 2024)
As new compliance domains like AI gain attention, leadership confidence remains mixed. 66% of CEOs are confident in their organization’s compliance with network and information security regulations, followed by 63% for consumer privacy and 57% for critical infrastructure. Confidence drops to 56% for cyber disclosure, 54% for both data protection and AI, and is lowest for resilience at 51%. (PwC, 2025)
68% of CISOs/CSOs are confident in their organization’s compliance with network and information security regulations, followed by 71% for consumer privacy and 68% for critical infrastructure. Confidence levels were 65% for cyber disclosure, 64% for both data protection and resilience, and 67% for AI. (PwC, 2025)
Simplifying compliance through automation with Vanta
The compliance statistics in this report underscore how rapidly the landscape is evolving, with new regulations, increasing enforcement, and rising breach risks reshaping what it takes to stay compliant. As regulatory pressure grows and stakeholder expectations rise, staying ahead requires more than a one-time action. It calls for a continuous approach to risk and compliance management.
For teams looking to keep pace, compliance automation offers a practical way to simplify workflows, reduce manual effort, and prepare for audits with greater speed and confidence. Vanta helps organizations spend 82% less time per framework and attestation-related audit.
“
“
Access Review Stage
Content / Functionality
Across all stages
Easily create and save a new access review at a point in time
View detailed audit evidence of historical access reviews
Setup access review procedures
Define a global access review procedure that stakeholders can follow, ensuring consistency and mitigation of human error in reviews
Set your access review frequency (monthly, quarterly, etc.) and working period/deadlines
Consolidate account access data from systems
Integrate systems using dozens of pre-built integrations, or “connectors”. System account and HRIS data is pulled into Vanta.
Upcoming integrations include Zoom and Intercom (account access), and Personio (HRIS)
Upload access files from non-integrated systems
View and select systems in-scope for the review
Review, approve, and deny user access
Select the appropriate systems reviewer and due date
Get automatic notifications and reminders to systems reviewer of deadlines
Automatic flagging of “risky” employee accounts that have been terminated or switched departments
Intuitive interface to see all accounts with access, account accept/deny buttons, and notes section
Track progress of individual systems access reviews and see accounts that need to be removed or have access modified
Bulk sort, filter, and alter accounts based on account roles and employee title
Assign remediation tasks to system owners
Built-in remediation workflow for reviewers to request access changes and for admin to view and manage requests
Optional task tracker integration to create tickets for any access changes and provide visibility to the status of tickets and remediation
Verify changes to access
Focused view of accounts flagged for access changes for easy tracking and management
Automated evidence of remediation completion displayed for integrated systems
Manual evidence of remediation can be uploaded for non-integrated systems
Report and re-evaluate results
Auditor can log into Vanta to see history of all completed access reviews
Internals can see status of reviews in progress and also historical review detail
Discover seven steps to adopting the framework’s controls and safeguarding your organisation.
Compliance
Guide / Report
Audit Ready Checklist
Get ready for your next audit with tips from Vanta’s team of GRC experts.
SOC 2
Blog
Starting up with SOC 2
Know the SOC 2 controls and how CPAs are involved
SOC 2
Events
Selling to the enterprise? Avoid these 3 lurking deal killers
Avoid these 3 lurking deal killers
Related Resources
Compliance
Blog
IT compliance audit checklist: 7 steps to follow
Discover the frameworks relevant for IT audits, the main compliance areas, and a checklist to support your team.
Compliance
Blog
4 ways to scale compliance with AI
Discover how Vanta AI helps modern GRC teams scale compliance efficiently while staying audit-ready.
Compliance
Blog
Cybersecurity laws and regulations in the UK: Your guide for 2025
Explore the cybersecurity compliance landscape in the UK and get quick insights into relevant local laws and regulations, as well as cross-border compliances.
Compliance
Events
Secure from the Start: How Founders Build Compliance Into Early-Stage Growth
Hear from the Head of Information Security at Robin AI and the Co-Founder & CEO of Pavlov as they share how they embedded security and compliance into their startup journey, without slowing down innovation.
Compliance
Events
Building Trust in the AI Boom: Security, Capital, and Credibility from Day One
Join the CFOs of Vanta and Mercury for a tactical conversation on how early-stage teams can build trust with investors and buyers, without slowing down.
Compliance
Events
Live Demo: Accelerate security and compliance workflows with AI
Join us for a live demo where we’ll walk you through the AI functionality within the Vanta platform and how it can simplify your compliance process. Plus, you’ll have the opportunity to ask live questions—whether it’s about AI specifically, compliance, or how to get started with Vanta.
Compliance
Blog
5 healthcare cybersecurity regulations and frameworks to follow in 2025
Discover five key healthcare cybersecurity regulations and frameworks that protect patient data. Get insights into their requirements, benefits, and overlaps.
Compliance
Events
Démo en direct : Simplifiez votre mise en conformité ISO 27001 ou SOC 2 avec Vanta
Participez à notre démo le 16 septembre pour découvrir Vanta en action et poser vos questions relatives à la conformité en direct.
Compliance
Blog
SOC 2 for healthcare organizations: Benefits and compliance steps
Read our guide to SOC 2 for healthcare to see if the standard can help you comply with HIPAA.
Compliance
Blog
Your complete guide to compliance management software
Learn everything you should know about compliance management software in our guide.
Compliance
Blog
CPS 234 vs. ISO 27001: Differences and overlaps
Go through our comparison of CPS 234 and ISO 27001. Find out where the standards overlap, what makes them different, and which one you should prioritise.
Compliance
Events
Product Demo: Automating Compliance for ISO 27001, GDPR and more with Vanta
Watch on-demand to explore how Vanta's automation can streamline your compliance efforts and save you time and money - all while helping you build customer trust.
%201%20(1).svg){kind=icon}
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.svg)
.svg)
.png)
.png)
.png)