How to request security budget from your CFO and exec teams | Vanta
BlogSecurity
March 25, 2026

How to request security budget from your CFO and exec teams

Written by
Jill Henriques
GRC Subject Matter Expert, GTM
Lucas Hogue
GRC Subject Matter expert
Reviewed by
No items found.

Accelerating security solutions for small businesses 

Tagore offers strategic services to small businesses. 

A partnership that can scale 

Tagore prioritized finding a managed compliance partner with an established product, dedicated support team, and rapid release rate.

Standing out from competitors

Tagore's partnership with Vanta enhances its strategic focus and deepens client value, creating differentiation in a competitive market.

Security and finance teams both care deeply about risk, but they define and measure it differently. Security leaders often lead with controls, frameworks, and technical severity, while finance executives focus on outcomes like revenue, predictability, and cost containment. 

But when security conversations don’t clearly connect to financial impact, budget requests can stall. Framing risk in a way that aligns with executive priorities can help security leaders bridge the cross-department communication gap and keep requests moving forward—while improving your odds for budget approval.

Read on for tips and insights from CISOs at Ro, The MJ Companies, and RAMP on how to better communicate with finance teams.

Tip 1: Speak their lingo

Every department has a language it understands and trusts, including phrases that signal efficiency, discipline, and business alignment. When security shows up to meetings with finance speaking its own dialect—e.g., GRC and controls—even the strongest ideas can get lost in translation.

“Use the company’s words back at them.” — Scott Bachand, CIO/CISO, Ro

You can be right about risk and still lose the budget conversation. When security discussions don’t plainly connect to business priorities, they’re easy to deprioritize. 

Instead, anchor your message in the metrics and outcomes that leadership already tracks. Rather than requesting budget to improve vendor risk posture, explain how improving vendor risk posture impacts the following:

  • Reducing manual toil
  • Eliminating duplicative tools
  • Freeing up teams to focus on higher-impact work

Framing security work in terms of productivity gains, tool consolidation, and resource optimization makes the investment easier to evaluate and defend.

Tip 2: Make the business case in dollars

Back the conversation with dollars and cents. You don’t have to be a math wizard; you just need credible figures demonstrating the potential costs of inaction or the cost savings of preventative work.

The MJ Companies CISO Braden Pitts says this tip is grounded in proportional risk reduction. When you quantify the value of assets like data, IP, revenue, and reputation, the investment required to protect them is clearly both rational and defensible. Over time, this approach proves quantitative business value and predictable performance—and it drives stability. 

Tip 3: Reframe as an efficiency and cost-control investment

Finance wants to see operational efficiency too. Manual reviews can hold up vendor ecosystem growth. Automation can eliminate up to 50 hours of review per vendor, allowing security teams to support scaling without additional headcount. Instead of reactive hiring and escalating operational costs, organizations gain predictable oversight that keeps pace with business growth. Security budgets are more likely to win approval when they remove procurement friction and supercharge growth.

Tip 4: Establish security as a growth lever

Without the right positioning, it’s harder for finance teams to prioritize security budget conversations. Recontextualize security as the reason the business can grow faster without increasing risk.

RAMP CISO Jonathan Aluveaux says tying discretionary security spend to expansion plans or emerging risks and frames it as part of a “very informed conversation.”

Lead with business enablement. Well-funded security programs speed up reviews, support expansion into regulated markets, and help prevent lost enterprise contracts. This also directly drives bigger deals, higher close rates, and faster revenue.

Tip 5: Keep the conversation going with quantitative results

Establish a regular reporting cadence between security and finance to keep tracking risk together. That way, finance can regularly see risk trends, exposure shifts, and investment needs in context. 

Bachand suggests framing trust as a measurable business input—one that affects conversion, retention, and long-term customer value—so that finance can see security’s impact beyond a single audit or incident. Aluveaux recommends precisely tying security budget conversations to customer and regulatory commitments, showing how investment will “scale with the growth of our business and our customers.” 

If communication is consistent and forward-looking, security becomes part of regular financial planning, rather than a roadblock.

Bring security and finance onto the same page

When security leaders share a language with finance, quantify impact in dollars, demonstrate operational efficiency, reduce strategic exposure, and make outcomes visible over time, the budget conversation evolves. Security shifts from overhead to essential infrastructure—a growth engine that drives disciplined, measurable performance.

Learn more from our VantaCon panel, Show me the ROI: CISOs discuss what trust is really worth.

Access Review Stage Content / Functionality
Across all stages
  • Easily create and save a new access review at a point in time
  • View detailed audit evidence of historical access reviews
Setup access review procedures
  • Define a global access review procedure that stakeholders can follow, ensuring consistency and mitigation of human error in reviews
  • Set your access review frequency (monthly, quarterly, etc.) and working period/deadlines
Consolidate account access data from systems
  • Integrate systems using dozens of pre-built integrations, or “connectors”. System account and HRIS data is pulled into Vanta.
  • Upcoming integrations include Zoom and Intercom (account access), and Personio (HRIS)
  • Upload access files from non-integrated systems
  • View and select systems in-scope for the review
Review, approve, and deny user access
  • Select the appropriate systems reviewer and due date
  • Get automatic notifications and reminders to systems reviewer of deadlines
  • Automatic flagging of “risky” employee accounts that have been terminated or switched departments
  • Intuitive interface to see all accounts with access, account accept/deny buttons, and notes section
  • Track progress of individual systems access reviews and see accounts that need to be removed or have access modified
  • Bulk sort, filter, and alter accounts based on account roles and employee title
Assign remediation tasks to system owners
  • Built-in remediation workflow for reviewers to request access changes and for admin to view and manage requests
  • Optional task tracker integration to create tickets for any access changes and provide visibility to the status of tickets and remediation
Verify changes to access
  • Focused view of accounts flagged for access changes for easy tracking and management
  • Automated evidence of remediation completion displayed for integrated systems
  • Manual evidence of remediation can be uploaded for non-integrated systems
Report and re-evaluate results
  • Auditor can log into Vanta to see history of all completed access reviews
  • Internals can see status of reviews in progress and also historical review detail
FEATURED VANTA RESOURCE

The ultimate guide to scaling your compliance program

Learn how to scale, manage, and optimize alongside your business goals.