Your vendor list grows almost on its own. A new SaaS tool here, a contractor there, a data processor your product team signed up last quarter, and before long you're relying on dozens of outside parties to keep the business running. Each one earns its place by doing something your team can't do alone. Each one also widens the surface where things can go wrong, and that exposure compounds faster than most programs track it.
Managing all of that is less a reviewing problem than a reporting one. Gathering evidence, sending questionnaires, and scoring what comes back is work most teams can handle. The part that slips is turning the results into something a busy executive will read and act on. You can run a sharp review and still produce a report that reads like a data export, lands in a shared drive, and changes no one's decision.
That distance between assessing a vendor and reporting on it well is where a lot of programs quietly lose their value. Closing it doesn't take a longer report. It takes a clearer one, built so the reader can act without calling you to explain what you meant. This article walks through the components a strong vendor risk assessment report should include, how to score and rate risk so your ratings hold up when someone questions them, and the common mistakes that leave reports sitting unread.
What is a vendor risk assessment report?
A vendor risk assessment or VRA report summarizes the risks a third party poses to your organization and recommends whether you should onboard the vendor, keep working with them, or walk away. It pulls the likelihood, impact, and overall risk ratings from your assessment into one place, but its job is to drive that decision, not just to store the data. The reports that fail read like a data export. The ones that work end with a clear recommendation you can act on, which feeds your vendor relationship management and lets you negotiate deals based on your risk appetite.
Here's the distinction worth knowing. The assessment is the process, the work of gathering evidence, reviewing controls, and scoring what you find. The report is the artifact that work produces, and its one job is to drive a decision. You can run a sharp assessment and still write a report nobody acts on, which is why the writing deserves as much attention as the review.
VRA reports are tailored to make vendor risks visible to the right executives, who are typically members of the procurement, security, or IT teams. They use it to make procurement decisions, initiate internal controls, and outline steps for managing vendor risk.
VRA reports are particularly handy if an organization is maturing its security and risk management program and is also expanding its vendor network. The data in the report serves as the baseline for risk-aware growth in a complex business environment.
{{cta_withimage20="/cta-blocks"}}
What are the benefits of vendor risk assessment reports?
Some of the main benefits of thorough risk reports include the following.
Proactive Risk Mitigation and Threat Adaptation
VRA reports help you uncover numerous vendor risk types, including operational, financial, and strategic risks. They inform your vendor-specific risk mitigation strategies.
Fortified Cybersecurity
Many vendors today are SaaS providers that expand your organization's potential attack surface as they connect to your tools. VRA reports help uncover these vulnerabilities so that you can patch them adequately.
Demonstrable Transparency and Trust
VRA reports can be used to demonstrate your security posture to stakeholders. Doing so reinforces your organization's ability to manage vendor risks well.
Simplified Compliance
External auditors often review your vendor risk management procedures to ensure they align with applicable standards. VRA reports serve as a trail of evidence to prove that you're proactively managing vendor risks.
Better Strategic Decision-Making
The report ultimately informs your vendor onboarding decision, which can have a long-term impact on your performance and security posture. It also justifies risk prioritization and allocation of more resources and efforts toward high-risk vendors.
8 components to include in a vendor risk assessment report
The content of a VRA report can vary slightly according to the intended user, but it typically features the following eight components.
1. Executive summary
Keep this to a single page. State the vendor's role, the scope of what you assessed, your top three to five findings, and your recommendation. Write it for a reader who stops here, because many will. Lead with the decision, then support it. If your CEO can't describe the situation after two minutes of reading, the summary needs another pass.
2. General vendor data and assessment outline
This section requires you to give an overview of the vendor's background and provide context for the assessment by outlining its scope. The documentation should be brief and cover basic vendor information, including the following.
- Name and contact data
- Industry
- Size
- Location
- Market position
- Business model
You may want to offer a concise overview of the vendor's operations that were assessed, such as their compliance procedures, internal controls, and security measures. If necessary, you can also include material aspects that weren't assessed alongside the reasons for it.
{{cta_webinar4="/cta-blocks"}}
3. Service description
Your VRA report should provide a concise and informational overview of the services your vendors will provide. Doing so will shift attention to the business function impacted by the service, indicating its general risk considerations. For instance, if you're assessing a payroll software provider, your IT and finance teams would generally know what risk areas to expect.
For certain third-party assessments, it may make sense to outline how your organization will use the product or service to identify potential threats promptly.
For example, if your vendor is a SaaS company offering a time-tracking platform, you can describe how employees will access it and what data they will be sharing. This will prompt risk managers to look into the types of data the software will collect.
4. Financial data
A vendor's financial stability can impact the quality of products and services they provide, which ultimately affects your operational stability. This is why financial review is a core part of vendor due diligence, and you should dedicate a section in your VRA report to a vendor's financial standing to proactively identify potential red flags.
You must first outline the documents you requested, which can be the following.
- Annual financial statements (balance sheet, income statement, cash flows, and so on)
- Credit report
- Tax filings
- Schedule of financed assets
- Debt disclosures (if applicable)
After listing these documents, describe the findings in the report so that the risk executive can assess the vendor's financial health. If there are any notable complications, it's a good idea to ask your finance department to weigh in on the report.
5. Cybersecurity posture
This is one of the most important sections of your VRA report, especially if you're partnering with SaaS vendors. The cybersecurity reporting should ideally be detailed. The overarching aim is to identify the potential attack surface and reduce the risk of incidents, such as data breaches or leaks.
In terms of VRA reporting, you need to specify the measures you've used for cybersecurity due diligence, for example security questionnaires, vendor interviews, vulnerability scans, and penetration testing reports.
Based on the outcomes of your assessment, you can outline the following details in your VRA report.
- Cybersecurity governance
- Endpoint security, including computers, tablets, phones, and so on
- Infrastructure security, including servers, databases, containers, and so on
- Technical controls (firewalls, encryption, and the like)
- Process controls (development lifecycle, recurring vulnerability scanning, and the like)
- Access management configurations and mechanisms
- Incident response plans
- Business continuity and disaster recovery plans
- Physical security
It's best to have your internal cybersecurity team vet this section of the report so that all identified threats are clearly explained alongside fitting conclusions.
{{cta_withimage5="/cta-blocks"}}
6. Data collection, use, and protection practices
Your VRA report must clarify which data a vendor will collect and store, as well as how their data protection measures fare. The section will help risk managers decide if a vendor's security measures and practices are up to organizational standards.
If possible, classify the sensitivity levels for the data points a vendor will collect. In our time-tracking software example from before, the platform might only log basic data like employees' names and tasks. Since no sensitive data is shared, standard protective measures like encryption should suffice.
If your report is about a payment processor that can access personally identifiable information (PII) and maintains cardholder data, you may want to specify additional security details, such as specific authentication flows using multi-factor authentication and PCI DSS compliance.
7. Operational dependencies
This section will elaborate on the business functions and activities that the vendor can impact. Reporting this data is essential for factoring in potential disruptions that can occur if a vendor fails to provide the agreed-upon deliverables.
Your VRA report should also account for the fourth (and Nth) parties, which are essentially third parties a vendor uses to deliver a product or service. Due to the vendor's dependency on them, you should consider any related concerns detected during the VRA process.
You can report on the vendor's third-party risk management practices to allow your risk managers to determine if the security measures are sufficient and whether you need to add any nth party to your inventory for closer tracking.
8. Risk observations and recommendations
The final section of your VRA report should summarize the findings and highlight the most notable risks that require action. You can also attach granular risk assessment documents to give the risk executive a better perspective of a vendor's risk profile.
Assign a risk score to every finding so the reader can prioritize threats by severity. The next section breaks down how to score consistently, so the ratings hold up when someone questions them.
After highlighting the most pressing risks, the report should suggest the right course of action. It can outline potential remediation plans or mitigation acceptances and make final recommendations on how to proceed with a vendor.
{{cta_testimonial5="/cta-blocks"}}
How to score and rate vendor risk
A severity label on its own tells leadership almost nothing. High, medium, and low feel precise, but they hide the reasoning that makes a rating worth trusting. A rating with no stated why is just an opinion in a nicer font.
Start with numbers. Assign a risk score to each control area you reviewed, then weight those scores by how much the vendor's access and data sensitivity matter to you. A missing control at a vendor holding your customer PII should pull far more weight than the same gap at a vendor who never touches sensitive data. That weighting keeps your scores honest across vendors that look nothing alike, and it stops every finding from landing in the same undifferentiated pile.
For every rating, state three things, the likelihood that the risk plays out, the impact if it does, and the control or obligation it touches. Tie it to something concrete, a SOC 2 control, a contractual commitment, a regulation. When you connect a "high" to its likelihood, its impact, and the specific control behind it, leadership can argue with the logic instead of guessing at what you meant.
Then judge residual risk against the vendor's criticality, not the raw finding count. A few medium findings at a vendor wired into your core operations can outweigh a longer list at one you could swap out in a week. Score every vendor the same way, and your subjective reviews turn into vendor risk management metrics you can compare, rank, and defend when an auditor asks how you got there.
Common mistakes that make reports useless
Most reports fail in a handful of predictable ways, and once you've seen them you'll spot them in your own drafts.
If you only fix one of these, fix the first. A report that names problems without naming actions hands the reader homework instead of a decision, and it's the easiest failure to catch. Read your own draft and ask whether someone could act on it without calling you to explain. If the answer is no, you've written documentation, not a report.
The last mistake is the quietest. A report you write once and forget describes a vendor as they were on the day you assessed them, which tells you less and less as months pass. Risk shifts. Vendors change tools, lose staff, and let certifications lapse, and some relationships end altogether, which is when a clean vendor offboarding matters most. The report that stays useful is the one you treat as a record you keep current, not a file you archive and hope nobody reopens.
Evaluate vendor risks and simplify reporting cycles with Vanta
A questionnaire captures one moment in time. The vendor answers on a Tuesday, you file the report, and months later half of it is stale. Continuous monitoring closes that gap by watching for drift between reviews, a control that lapses or a certification that expires, so the report stays a live view of the vendor rather than a photograph of one afternoon.
Vanta has vendor risk management software that runs the full assessment lifecycle with an agentic TPRM Agent, so your team spends its time on decisions instead of paperwork. The Agent handles the work a static report can't keep up with, including the following.
- Discovering newly adopted vendors and flagging shadow IT and AI across your procurement tools.
- Pulling findings from vendor SOC 2 reports, DPAs, and questionnaires to surface real exposure in seconds.
- Applying your own risk tiers and scoring logic to every assessment for consistent results.
- Monitoring vendors around the clock for breaches and material changes, then drafting tailored remediation plans.
Additionally, you can also leverage Vanta’s Risk Management suite to set up a comprehensive risk register to simplify your risk assessment workflows. You can track your identified risks, mitigation actions, and assigned task owners—all from one place.
The platform’s automated workflows can support risk assessments for several pre-built risk scenarios. The best part is that you can instantly access risk assessment reports that present both qualitative and quantitative data in a clear, structured format.
Watch our webinar to see Vendor Risk Management in action. Or schedule a custom demo today.
{{cta_simple5="/cta-blocks"}}
Vendor risk assessment
What should a vendor risk assessment report feature?
Looking to save up to 50% of time with AI-powered security reviews?
Your vendor list grows almost on its own. A new SaaS tool here, a contractor there, a data processor your product team signed up last quarter, and before long you're relying on dozens of outside parties to keep the business running. Each one earns its place by doing something your team can't do alone. Each one also widens the surface where things can go wrong, and that exposure compounds faster than most programs track it.
Managing all of that is less a reviewing problem than a reporting one. Gathering evidence, sending questionnaires, and scoring what comes back is work most teams can handle. The part that slips is turning the results into something a busy executive will read and act on. You can run a sharp review and still produce a report that reads like a data export, lands in a shared drive, and changes no one's decision.
That distance between assessing a vendor and reporting on it well is where a lot of programs quietly lose their value. Closing it doesn't take a longer report. It takes a clearer one, built so the reader can act without calling you to explain what you meant. This article walks through the components a strong vendor risk assessment report should include, how to score and rate risk so your ratings hold up when someone questions them, and the common mistakes that leave reports sitting unread.
What is a vendor risk assessment report?
A vendor risk assessment or VRA report summarizes the risks a third party poses to your organization and recommends whether you should onboard the vendor, keep working with them, or walk away. It pulls the likelihood, impact, and overall risk ratings from your assessment into one place, but its job is to drive that decision, not just to store the data. The reports that fail read like a data export. The ones that work end with a clear recommendation you can act on, which feeds your vendor relationship management and lets you negotiate deals based on your risk appetite.
Here's the distinction worth knowing. The assessment is the process, the work of gathering evidence, reviewing controls, and scoring what you find. The report is the artifact that work produces, and its one job is to drive a decision. You can run a sharp assessment and still write a report nobody acts on, which is why the writing deserves as much attention as the review.
VRA reports are tailored to make vendor risks visible to the right executives, who are typically members of the procurement, security, or IT teams. They use it to make procurement decisions, initiate internal controls, and outline steps for managing vendor risk.
VRA reports are particularly handy if an organization is maturing its security and risk management program and is also expanding its vendor network. The data in the report serves as the baseline for risk-aware growth in a complex business environment.
{{cta_withimage20="/cta-blocks"}}
What are the benefits of vendor risk assessment reports?
Some of the main benefits of thorough risk reports include the following.
Proactive Risk Mitigation and Threat Adaptation
VRA reports help you uncover numerous vendor risk types, including operational, financial, and strategic risks. They inform your vendor-specific risk mitigation strategies.
Fortified Cybersecurity
Many vendors today are SaaS providers that expand your organization's potential attack surface as they connect to your tools. VRA reports help uncover these vulnerabilities so that you can patch them adequately.
Demonstrable Transparency and Trust
VRA reports can be used to demonstrate your security posture to stakeholders. Doing so reinforces your organization's ability to manage vendor risks well.
Simplified Compliance
External auditors often review your vendor risk management procedures to ensure they align with applicable standards. VRA reports serve as a trail of evidence to prove that you're proactively managing vendor risks.
Better Strategic Decision-Making
The report ultimately informs your vendor onboarding decision, which can have a long-term impact on your performance and security posture. It also justifies risk prioritization and allocation of more resources and efforts toward high-risk vendors.
8 components to include in a vendor risk assessment report
The content of a VRA report can vary slightly according to the intended user, but it typically features the following eight components.
1. Executive summary
Keep this to a single page. State the vendor's role, the scope of what you assessed, your top three to five findings, and your recommendation. Write it for a reader who stops here, because many will. Lead with the decision, then support it. If your CEO can't describe the situation after two minutes of reading, the summary needs another pass.
2. General vendor data and assessment outline
This section requires you to give an overview of the vendor's background and provide context for the assessment by outlining its scope. The documentation should be brief and cover basic vendor information, including the following.
- Name and contact data
- Industry
- Size
- Location
- Market position
- Business model
You may want to offer a concise overview of the vendor's operations that were assessed, such as their compliance procedures, internal controls, and security measures. If necessary, you can also include material aspects that weren't assessed alongside the reasons for it.
{{cta_webinar4="/cta-blocks"}}
3. Service description
Your VRA report should provide a concise and informational overview of the services your vendors will provide. Doing so will shift attention to the business function impacted by the service, indicating its general risk considerations. For instance, if you're assessing a payroll software provider, your IT and finance teams would generally know what risk areas to expect.
For certain third-party assessments, it may make sense to outline how your organization will use the product or service to identify potential threats promptly.
For example, if your vendor is a SaaS company offering a time-tracking platform, you can describe how employees will access it and what data they will be sharing. This will prompt risk managers to look into the types of data the software will collect.
4. Financial data
A vendor's financial stability can impact the quality of products and services they provide, which ultimately affects your operational stability. This is why financial review is a core part of vendor due diligence, and you should dedicate a section in your VRA report to a vendor's financial standing to proactively identify potential red flags.
You must first outline the documents you requested, which can be the following.
- Annual financial statements (balance sheet, income statement, cash flows, and so on)
- Credit report
- Tax filings
- Schedule of financed assets
- Debt disclosures (if applicable)
After listing these documents, describe the findings in the report so that the risk executive can assess the vendor's financial health. If there are any notable complications, it's a good idea to ask your finance department to weigh in on the report.
5. Cybersecurity posture
This is one of the most important sections of your VRA report, especially if you're partnering with SaaS vendors. The cybersecurity reporting should ideally be detailed. The overarching aim is to identify the potential attack surface and reduce the risk of incidents, such as data breaches or leaks.
In terms of VRA reporting, you need to specify the measures you've used for cybersecurity due diligence, for example security questionnaires, vendor interviews, vulnerability scans, and penetration testing reports.
Based on the outcomes of your assessment, you can outline the following details in your VRA report.
- Cybersecurity governance
- Endpoint security, including computers, tablets, phones, and so on
- Infrastructure security, including servers, databases, containers, and so on
- Technical controls (firewalls, encryption, and the like)
- Process controls (development lifecycle, recurring vulnerability scanning, and the like)
- Access management configurations and mechanisms
- Incident response plans
- Business continuity and disaster recovery plans
- Physical security
It's best to have your internal cybersecurity team vet this section of the report so that all identified threats are clearly explained alongside fitting conclusions.
{{cta_withimage5="/cta-blocks"}}
6. Data collection, use, and protection practices
Your VRA report must clarify which data a vendor will collect and store, as well as how their data protection measures fare. The section will help risk managers decide if a vendor's security measures and practices are up to organizational standards.
If possible, classify the sensitivity levels for the data points a vendor will collect. In our time-tracking software example from before, the platform might only log basic data like employees' names and tasks. Since no sensitive data is shared, standard protective measures like encryption should suffice.
If your report is about a payment processor that can access personally identifiable information (PII) and maintains cardholder data, you may want to specify additional security details, such as specific authentication flows using multi-factor authentication and PCI DSS compliance.
7. Operational dependencies
This section will elaborate on the business functions and activities that the vendor can impact. Reporting this data is essential for factoring in potential disruptions that can occur if a vendor fails to provide the agreed-upon deliverables.
Your VRA report should also account for the fourth (and Nth) parties, which are essentially third parties a vendor uses to deliver a product or service. Due to the vendor's dependency on them, you should consider any related concerns detected during the VRA process.
You can report on the vendor's third-party risk management practices to allow your risk managers to determine if the security measures are sufficient and whether you need to add any nth party to your inventory for closer tracking.
8. Risk observations and recommendations
The final section of your VRA report should summarize the findings and highlight the most notable risks that require action. You can also attach granular risk assessment documents to give the risk executive a better perspective of a vendor's risk profile.
Assign a risk score to every finding so the reader can prioritize threats by severity. The next section breaks down how to score consistently, so the ratings hold up when someone questions them.
After highlighting the most pressing risks, the report should suggest the right course of action. It can outline potential remediation plans or mitigation acceptances and make final recommendations on how to proceed with a vendor.
{{cta_testimonial5="/cta-blocks"}}
How to score and rate vendor risk
A severity label on its own tells leadership almost nothing. High, medium, and low feel precise, but they hide the reasoning that makes a rating worth trusting. A rating with no stated why is just an opinion in a nicer font.
Start with numbers. Assign a risk score to each control area you reviewed, then weight those scores by how much the vendor's access and data sensitivity matter to you. A missing control at a vendor holding your customer PII should pull far more weight than the same gap at a vendor who never touches sensitive data. That weighting keeps your scores honest across vendors that look nothing alike, and it stops every finding from landing in the same undifferentiated pile.
For every rating, state three things, the likelihood that the risk plays out, the impact if it does, and the control or obligation it touches. Tie it to something concrete, a SOC 2 control, a contractual commitment, a regulation. When you connect a "high" to its likelihood, its impact, and the specific control behind it, leadership can argue with the logic instead of guessing at what you meant.
Then judge residual risk against the vendor's criticality, not the raw finding count. A few medium findings at a vendor wired into your core operations can outweigh a longer list at one you could swap out in a week. Score every vendor the same way, and your subjective reviews turn into vendor risk management metrics you can compare, rank, and defend when an auditor asks how you got there.
Common mistakes that make reports useless
Most reports fail in a handful of predictable ways, and once you've seen them you'll spot them in your own drafts.
If you only fix one of these, fix the first. A report that names problems without naming actions hands the reader homework instead of a decision, and it's the easiest failure to catch. Read your own draft and ask whether someone could act on it without calling you to explain. If the answer is no, you've written documentation, not a report.
The last mistake is the quietest. A report you write once and forget describes a vendor as they were on the day you assessed them, which tells you less and less as months pass. Risk shifts. Vendors change tools, lose staff, and let certifications lapse, and some relationships end altogether, which is when a clean vendor offboarding matters most. The report that stays useful is the one you treat as a record you keep current, not a file you archive and hope nobody reopens.
Evaluate vendor risks and simplify reporting cycles with Vanta
A questionnaire captures one moment in time. The vendor answers on a Tuesday, you file the report, and months later half of it is stale. Continuous monitoring closes that gap by watching for drift between reviews, a control that lapses or a certification that expires, so the report stays a live view of the vendor rather than a photograph of one afternoon.
Vanta has vendor risk management software that runs the full assessment lifecycle with an agentic TPRM Agent, so your team spends its time on decisions instead of paperwork. The Agent handles the work a static report can't keep up with, including the following.
- Discovering newly adopted vendors and flagging shadow IT and AI across your procurement tools.
- Pulling findings from vendor SOC 2 reports, DPAs, and questionnaires to surface real exposure in seconds.
- Applying your own risk tiers and scoring logic to every assessment for consistent results.
- Monitoring vendors around the clock for breaches and material changes, then drafting tailored remediation plans.
Additionally, you can also leverage Vanta’s Risk Management suite to set up a comprehensive risk register to simplify your risk assessment workflows. You can track your identified risks, mitigation actions, and assigned task owners—all from one place.
The platform’s automated workflows can support risk assessments for several pre-built risk scenarios. The best part is that you can instantly access risk assessment reports that present both qualitative and quantitative data in a clear, structured format.
Watch our webinar to see Vendor Risk Management in action. Or schedule a custom demo today.
{{cta_simple5="/cta-blocks"}}
Explore more TPRM articles
Introduction to TPRM
Vendor lifecycle management
Vendor risk assessment
Running a VRM program
Regulatory compliance and industry standards
Get started with TPRM
Start your TPRM journey with these related resources.
How to minimize third-party risk with vendor management
Get insights and best practices from security & compliance experts on how to manage third-party vendor risk in this free guide.
.svg)
Vanta in Action: Vendor Risk Management
Vendor security reviews can be manual and time-consuming, draining security teams of precious hours. Vanta’s Vendor Risk Management solution changes that, automating and streamlining security reviews so that you can spend less time on repetitive work and more time strengthening your security posture. Curious to see what it looks like?
10 important questions to add to your security questionnaire [with examples]
Use these 10 vendor security questionnaire questions to assess compliance, uncover risks, and evaluate third-party vendors before onboarding.
