CRI Cyber Profile: A complete guide for financial institutions

Financial institutions operate within intense restrictions. They can face extensive regulatory scrutiny around the world. For global or multinational institutions, compliance becomes a pressing and ongoing challenge as they must align with numerous regional cybersecurity regulations, each with its own reporting and governance expectations.

‍

The Cyber Risk Institute (CRI) Cyber Profile was developed to ease this compliance overhead for security teams in the finance industry. It helps reduce the regulatory burden by harmonizing expectations into a unified framework, minimizing the burden of duplicated assessments and fragmented reporting cycles.

‍

In this guide, we’ll discuss:

• What the CRI Cyber Profile is
• Who should comply with it
• Six steps to CRI Cyber Profile compliance

‍

What is the CRI Cyber Profile?

The CRI Cyber Profile is a security standard created in 2020 with input from major financial institutions, regulators, and trade associations. It was designed to consolidate overlapping requirements from multiple cybersecurity regulations and standards in the financial sector.

‍

The Cyber Profile serves as an alternative to the FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT), which retired as of 2025. It’s also a more comprehensive, regulator-aligned framework that helps financial institutions demonstrate regulatory alignment and a strong security posture across jurisdictions.

‍

“

TWith the recent sunsetting of the FFIEC CAT, the CRI Cyber Profile is poised to become the leading cybersecurity framework for the financial services industry. Its ability to harmonize global regulatory requirements, combined with its dynamic and scalable design, enables organizations to meet evolving regulatory expectations without overhauling their programs. This makes its adoption across the sector likely to grow rapidly in the coming years.”

‍

Ethan Heller

GRC Subject Matter Expert, Vanta

|

LinkedIn

‍

The framework also stands out as it uses impact levels to evaluate and scale cybersecurity requirements conceptually, which means organizations only implement controls proportional to their risk exposure and system importance.

‍

{{cta_withimage22="/cta-blocks"}}

‍

The CRI Cyber Profile maturity levels

The CRI Cyber Profile defines four impact tiers that help organizations determine the number and depth of diagnostic statements they need to complete. Each tier represents the organization’s systemic impact on the financial sector, and the corresponding rigor expected in security practices. 

‍

‍

To determine your tier, complete the CRI Cyber Profile’s questionnaire. Here are some sample questions to expect:

• Does your institution consistently participate in (e.g., clear or settle) at least 5% of the value of transactions in a critical market?
• Does the number of individuals whose data your institution processes exceed 5 million?
• Do you provide products or services to financial institutions that involve customer data processing or storage?

‍

Consider your organization’s regulatory and risk environment when answering questions to accurately determine your tier and scope security requirements.

‍

Who should comply with the CRI Cyber Profile?

The CRI Cyber Profile is primarily intended for financial institutions, such as banks, credit unions, fintech, and payment processors. However, because the framework emphasizes third-party risks, any organization that provides services for financial institutions should also align with its requirements. This includes:

• Cloud service providers (CSPs)
• Managed service providers (MSPs)
• IT providers

‍

Compliance with the CRI Cyber Profile isn’t mandatory. However, with regulators increasingly emphasizing harmonization and supervisory ease, it’s becoming a baseline expectation in the financial sector and a preferred reference point in competitive cross-border assessments.

‍

Benefits of compliance with the CRI Cyber Profile

Compliance with the CRI Cyber Profile introduces the following benefits to financial institutions:

• Reduced regulatory burden: The Cyber Profile is designed to harmonize overlapping regulatory expectations into a centralized framework, streamlining compliance efforts and reducing the need for duplicative audits.
• Strengthened third-party risk management: The framework boosts third-party oversight practices through security questionnaires, business impact analyses, and other regular assessments.
• Streamlined scaling: The framework’s impact tiers ensure that organizations implement only the controls appropriate for their risk environment. This can be cost-effective compared to one-size-fits-all frameworks, and structured scaling is always an option as compliance needs evolve.
• Increased board oversight: Leadership involvement is a core requirement of the CRI Cyber Profile, as it requires demonstrable proof of their oversight through management reviews, approvals, and reports. Such visible governance strengthens regulatory confidence.
• Cross-framework alignment: Alignment with the CRI Cyber Profile allows you to map diagnostic statements to controls in other relevant frameworks and regulations, such as ISO 27001, NIST CSF, SOC 2, and DORA, speeding up compliance timelines.

‍

“

The CRI Profile is incredibly valuable today because of its scalable, risk-based framework that can evolve with technological shifts while maintaining regulatory alignment across a wide range of jurisdictions. Due to its dynamic nature, companies adopting the CRI profile can ensure that their security programs remain resilient to the ever-changing threat landscape.”

‍

Ethan Heller

GRC Subject Matter Expert, Vanta

|

LinkedIn

‍

How to achieve CRI Cyber Profile compliance

Regardless of your organization’s impact level, the CRI Cyber Profile compliance involves six broad steps:

1. Establish scope and determine tier
2. Set up policies and risk framework
3. Map controls
4. Collect evidence
5. Conduct a self-assessment
6. Remediate gaps

‍

{{cta_withimage22="/cta-blocks"}}

Step 1: Establish scope and determine tier

The first step is to establish an inventory of in-scope assets. What you establish now determines the timelines, requirements, and investments for the rest of the compliance process.

‍

Conduct an internal assessment and account for all systems, functions, physical assets, and external dependencies that create, store, process, or transmit sensitive information.

‍

Then, complete the CRI Questionnaire to determine your organization’s impact level. If you’re uncertain about a response, you should select the one that will lead to a higher impact tier to reduce the risk of insufficient security. You can also consult with your security team or external consultants for niche guidance.

‍

Step 2: Set up policies and risk framework

Establish the relevant diagnostic statements for your impact tier. These help define the criteria for internal assessments and identify gaps in coverage.

‍

You can conduct risk assessments to identify the various risk scenarios your organization may be exposed to in the financial sector, covering both internal and external threats. Use the findings to build a risk framework tailored to your impact tier, which will determine the level of rigor expected for your policies and controls.

‍

Step 3: Map controls

CRI Cyber profile overlaps with many industry-relevant frameworks, such as ISO 27001, SOC 2, and the NIST CSF. This means that organizations already compliant with any of these frameworks can map existing controls to CRI diagnostic statements and accelerate compliance.

‍

To make the process more efficient, CRI provides official mappings of its diagnostic statements to these frameworks, as well as to finance-sector regulations like DORA. Compliance automation solutions can further streamline this step by managing control crosswalking, evidence collection, and unified reporting.

‍

Step 4: Collect evidence

As a self-attestation framework, CRI compliance relies heavily on thorough documentation. The best practice is to collect all compliance-related documentation, technical guides, and ownership details across departments and maintain them in a central repository. This helps compliance evidence be readily available during internal reviews or external and cross-border audits, while also making continuous monitoring more streamlined.

‍

Step 5: Conduct a self-assessment

Once your controls and documentation are ready, conduct an internal audit using the CRI Cyber Profile’s diagnostic statements. Each statement can earn one of eight possible responses:

1. Yes: The control outcomes are regularly tested and demonstrate that controls are designed and operating as intended
2. No: The control outcomes haven’t meaningfully improved
3. Partial: A meaningful subset of outcomes is tested and shown to operate as intended
4. Not Applicable: The diagnostic statement doesn’t apply to your organization
5. Yes-Risk Based: The control outcomes are regularly tested and operate as intended for the highest-risk assets or functions
6. Yes-Compensating Control: The intent of the diagnostic statement is met through an approved compensating control
7. Not Tested: Controls related to the diagnostic statement haven’t been tested yet
8. I don’t know: Used as a placeholder until a more accurate response is determined

‍

Document your findings for each diagnostic statement and rank identified gaps by priority, using criteria such as impact, likelihood, and required investment. Include your prioritization methodology in the same record for consistency and visibility.

‍

Step 6: Remediate gaps

Use the findings from your internal assessments as a roadmap to address identified gaps. Create a prioritized remediation list, starting with zero-day threats and high-risk areas, then moving down by impact and likelihood.

‍

Review your controls regularly and update policies, processes, and technical measures to stay ahead of emerging threats and ensure safeguards stay relevant to your risk environment.

‍

Challenges of CRI Cyber Profile compliance

Although the CRI Cyber Profile is designed to reduce compliance complexity in the financial sector, alignment can still be challenging for several key reasons:

• High resource requirements: Identifying, validating, and collecting the necessary evidence for each of the 318 control objectives and 200+ diagnostic statements requires significant team time, resources, and cross-functional expertise.
• Gathering and maintaining up-to-date documentation: Because CRI is a self-attestation framework, maintaining current documentation is a core part of demonstrating compliance. Coordinating this evidence across decentralized functions and systems can be complex, time-consuming, and prone to errors.
• Limited prescriptive guidance: While the CRI Guidebook does provide detailed guidance and examples of appropriate controls, its principle- and outcome-based approach still needs organizations to interpret and operationalize requirements on their own.
• Ongoing monitoring and updates: Reviewing and updating compliance evidence, controls, and policies manually requires a substantial amount of time and can divert stakeholders from regular tasks.

‍

You can mitigate these challenges with a strong compliance and trust solution such as Vanta, a platform that streamlines the CRI compliance process with automation, continuous compliance, and risk-driven workflows.

‍

You can mitigate these challenges with a strong compliance and trust solution such as Vanta, a platform that streamlines the CRI compliance process through automation, continuous compliance, and risk-driven workflows.

‍

Streamline CRI Cyber Profile compliance with Vanta

Vanta is a leading agentic trust platform that helps organizations achieve and maintain CRI compliance with clear guidance, AI-powered workflows, and fast automation. The platform unifies requirements from several frameworks like DORA, APRA, CPS 234, and SOC 2 to support CRI. You get 300+ mapped controls, four impact tiers, and ready-to-use CRI v2.1 policies, which help build a clear readiness path.

‍

Vanta’s dedicated CRI Cyber Profile product offers numerous helpful features, including:

• 1,200+ automated, hourly tests
• Real-time monitoring through a centralized dashboard
• Automated evidence collection powered by 400+ integrations
• Pre-built, customizable controls
• Third-party risk management 
• Access to Public Trust Centers to prove trust to regulators and customers

‍

Vanta’s cross-mapping feature can also help you reuse evidence for existing controls and achieve readiness faster.

‍

Book a custom demo to see how Vanta makes CRI Cyber Profile compliance efficient.

‍

{{cta_simple43="/cta-blocks"}}

‍

FAQs

Is the CRI Cyber Profile mandatory for all financial institutions?

No, CRI Cyber Profile compliance isn’t mandatory. However, financial institutions choose to align voluntarily as it provides standardized cybersecurity self-assessments, maps to multiple standards and regulations, and supports supervisory conversations.

‍

How long does CRI Profile implementation take?

Timelines vary based on organization size, existing security posture, and impact tier. The full implementation process can take several months, after which you must continuously review and improve your system.

‍

How does CRI Cyber Profile differ from FFIEC CAT or NIST CSF?

The main difference is scope. NIST CSF is designed to apply to organizations across all industries, while the (now retired) FFIEC CAT was intended specifically for U.S. financial institutions. CRI Cyber Profile caters to the global financial sector and consolidates regulatory requirements across jurisdictions.

‍

Can existing SOC 2, ISO 27001, or NIST controls be reused for the CRI Cyber Profile?

Yes. Many controls map cleanly as the framework was designed using ISO 27001 and NIST as foundations. The intent was to allow financial institutions to reuse their implementations instead of starting from scratch.

‍

How often should organizations update their CRI compliance evidence?

Organizations should update their CRI compliance evidence at least annually or following any material changes in their risk landscape, technology, processes, or business operations. This ensures that the Cyber Profile accurately reflects their current environment.

‍

How much does CRI Profile implementation cost?

There aren’t any official estimates for CRI Cyber Profile implementation costs. Depending on your system maturity, existing infrastructure, and impact tier, the investments vary significantly, ranging anywhere from ~$5,000 to $50,000+.

‍