BlogSecurity
December 17, 2025

The top 6 AI security trends for 2026—and how companies can prepare

Written by
Jess Munday
Sr. Content Marketing Manager
Reviewed by
No items found.

Accelerating security solutions for small businesses 

Tagore offers strategic services to small businesses. 

A partnership that can scale 

Tagore prioritized finding a managed compliance partner with an established product, dedicated support team, and rapid release rate.

Standing out from competitors

Tagore's partnership with Vanta enhances its strategic focus and deepens client value, creating differentiation in a competitive market.

AI is changing the threat landscape faster than organizations can respond. AI-generated phishing and fraud have increased sharply year-over-year, and GenAI is enabling more sophisticated cyber attacks than ever before. 

Businesses are feeling the pain. Our team at Vanta surveyed 2,500 business and IT leaders across the globe and found that nearly three-quarters believe AI threats are outpacing their ability to manage them. 

The third edition of our State of Trust report reveals a widening gap between AI adoption and readiness. As AI usage grows, security leaders have reported that they have a limited understanding of how to manage the risks that come with increased adoption.  

Still, AI is having a positive impact on many companies—AI tools, including agents, are helping teams increase efficiency and reduce burnout. 

At Vanta, we see this tension play out often: AI brings meaningful efficiency gains, while also exposing risks in a company’s underlying security posture. But by grounding AI initiatives in strong security fundamentals, building intentional governance, and automating repetitive work that slows teams down, organizations can turn AI into a source of strength, and increase customer trust in the process.

{{cta_withimage42="/cta-blocks"}}

1. AI is amplifying the volume and precision of cybersecurity attacks

Cybersecurity threats are growing in number, frequency, and nature. AI is a key driver, amplifying not only the volume but also the precision of these attacks.

  • 72% of security decision-makers say risk has never been higher (up from 55% in 2024)
  • 56% experience threat activity at least once a week.
  • Half of companies report an uptick in AI-generated phishing, malware, and identity theft/fraud

The unrelenting pace of attacks is leading to burnout for security professionals. To combat them and stay ahead, security leaders need real‑time visibility and faster ways to prioritize threats and avoid backlogs.

The Vanta POV: Automation can mitigate attacks 

“Many organizations still rely on manual processes for access governance, identity reviews, and incident response,” says Khushboo Kashyap, Senior Director of GRC at Vanta. “Automating these workflows can help teams keep up with the increased pace of threats.” 

2. Organizations are adopting AI faster than they can secure it

Most organizations haven’t built the baseline maturity required for AI to be a true force multiplier. Instead, they’re implementing AI products, tools, and agents without clearly defined governance frameworks and policies, increasing security risks to their business. 

  • 59% say AI-related security threats outpace their expertise
  • Only 44% have a company AI policy, and 45% conduct regular AI risk assessments
  • Governance around data is weak: less than half apply strict data minimization; only 35% rely solely on anonymized data to train AI

The Vanta POV: Addressing AI risks starts with a strong foundation

Before adding new AI frameworks, businesses need to first establish the right people, processes, and technology to understand AI. This could include tailored AI playbooks and training, clear policies on AI usage, and strong access controls and identity proofing. 

“AI adoption can amplify a solid security and compliance program, but it won’t fix fundamental gaps,” notes Khushboo. 

3. Agentic AI adoption is high, but control is low

When it comes to agentic AI in particular, organizations are racing ahead to implement agents without clear guardrails in place. 

  • 79% are using or actively planning to use agentic AI this year
  • 65% say their use of agentic AI outpaces their understanding of it
  • Only 48% have a framework for granting or limiting autonomy in AI systems
  • 61% are comfortable with agents overriding human decisions in some scenarios, while 62% fear agentic AI could erode customer trust

The Vanta POV: AI agents need human oversight 

To safeguard against agentic AI risk, Khushboo stresses that human oversight must remain a core part of agentic workflows. Humans should design the scope, validate outputs, and ensure all actions are auditable and reversible. “AI agents can be very powerful,” Khushboo notes, “but only if humans are defining the rules and reviewing what they do.”

4. Security helps gain customer trust, but businesses don’t know how to prove it

Customer trust has become a growth driver in business today, and maintaining a strong security posture can help companies earn and keep it. 

  • 82% say improving security and compliance directly boosts customer trust (vs 67% in 2024)
  • 77% say stakeholders demand verified proof of compliance (vs 65% in 2024)

But the way businesses prove their security is broken. Security teams are stuck in high-effort, repetitive audit cycles and manual evidence collection, leaving them little time to focus on security improvements. 

  • 61% say they spend more time proving security than improving it
  • 64% say today’s security frameworks feel like “security theater”
  • Teams spend 12 weeks per year on compliance

The Vanta POV: Systematize evidence collection

Khushboo has often observed Vanta customers getting stuck in a cycle of compliance busywork. Systemizing and automating collection can help. “When teams stop doing manual, screenshot-based evidence collection, they get time back for actual risk reduction,” she says. 

5. AI has increased third-party vendor risk

Third-party ecosystems are fragile, and AI has only increased this fragility. Vendor risk is now intertwined with AI risk, and static assessments can’t keep up.

  • 67% say they have strong visibility into third-party risk
  • But 56% have experienced a vendor breach in the past 6–12 months (up from 48%)
  • 57% have terminated a vendor over security concerns (up from 50%)
  • Teams spend 9 working weeks per year on vendor reviews and assessments (up from 7)

As many third-party tools now embed AI agents or LLM capabilities, organizations need AI-specific sections in vendor questionnaires and contracts, specifically for data usage, model training, and IP risk.

The Vanta POV: Continuous monitoring is essential

“You have to ask your vendors: Are they training models on your data? Are you permitting that? What guardrails exist?” Khushboo says. 

Static reviews can’t capture all AI behaviors or new vulnerabilities. Continuous monitoring, Khushboo says, is the only realistic way to manage a vendor ecosystem that’s constantly evolving.

6. AI introduces new risks but also offers powerful ways to mitigate them

While AI creates new attack surfaces, it’s also one of the most effective tools for managing risk at scale. Business leaders using AI are already seeing meaningful security outcomes: 

  • 95% say AI and automation have improved security team effectiveness
  • 51% report faster risk assessments
  • 50% see improved accuracy
  • 36% cite streamlined compliance
  • 79% say their security team is increasing its usage of AI in security programs
  • 76% say AI is reducing burnout by removing manual, repetitive tasks

These findings underscore an important truth: AI can harden defenses, increase efficiency, and support continuous monitoring, but only if teams have the governance, controls, and human oversight to use it safely. 

The Vanta POV: AI can transform security

Khushboo highlights several high-value security use cases where AI can help scale programs and boost trust: SOC alert triage, threat correlation, vulnerability prioritization, non-human identity governance, and secure coding support. “These are areas where AI can meaningfully transform security operations,” she says.

Building the foundation for trustworthy AI

The State of Trust data shows a widening gap between adoption and readiness. But by grounding AI initiatives in strong security fundamentals and building intentional governance, AI can become a source of strength. 

The companies that embrace this shift will be the ones best equipped to navigate AI-driven threats and earn the confidence of their customers.

{{cta_withimage42="/cta-blocks"}}

Access Review Stage Content / Functionality
Across all stages
  • Easily create and save a new access review at a point in time
  • View detailed audit evidence of historical access reviews
Setup access review procedures
  • Define a global access review procedure that stakeholders can follow, ensuring consistency and mitigation of human error in reviews
  • Set your access review frequency (monthly, quarterly, etc.) and working period/deadlines
Consolidate account access data from systems
  • Integrate systems using dozens of pre-built integrations, or “connectors”. System account and HRIS data is pulled into Vanta.
  • Upcoming integrations include Zoom and Intercom (account access), and Personio (HRIS)
  • Upload access files from non-integrated systems
  • View and select systems in-scope for the review
Review, approve, and deny user access
  • Select the appropriate systems reviewer and due date
  • Get automatic notifications and reminders to systems reviewer of deadlines
  • Automatic flagging of “risky” employee accounts that have been terminated or switched departments
  • Intuitive interface to see all accounts with access, account accept/deny buttons, and notes section
  • Track progress of individual systems access reviews and see accounts that need to be removed or have access modified
  • Bulk sort, filter, and alter accounts based on account roles and employee title
Assign remediation tasks to system owners
  • Built-in remediation workflow for reviewers to request access changes and for admin to view and manage requests
  • Optional task tracker integration to create tickets for any access changes and provide visibility to the status of tickets and remediation
Verify changes to access
  • Focused view of accounts flagged for access changes for easy tracking and management
  • Automated evidence of remediation completion displayed for integrated systems
  • Manual evidence of remediation can be uploaded for non-integrated systems
Report and re-evaluate results
  • Auditor can log into Vanta to see history of all completed access reviews
  • Internals can see status of reviews in progress and also historical review detail
FEATURED VANTA RESOURCE

The ultimate guide to scaling your compliance program

Learn how to scale, manage, and optimize alongside your business goals.